• Kalvin@lemmy.kadaikupi.site
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I am questioning whether it’s true that Microsoft is attempting to implement more brand-based marketing, ecosystem lock-in, and a walled garden by rebranding Remote Desktop as a Windows App. Yes, I agree that everything now uses “app” in computer terminology; at least, it seems so. What if one day even the OS kernel is called an app too? Lol

    • seralth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m going to start referring to kernels as the os app. Just to fuck with people.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Well, and there’s also just lots of webpages implemented as an SPA – Single-Page Application.
          Which you might be able to register in your browser as a PWA – Progressive Web App.
          And which are just generally equally as interactive as an app, so good luck explaining the difference to folks who don’t care about implementation specifics…

          • vivendi@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Honestly? They’re based for being so easy to make

            For the record, I am a C/Dart/Rust native dev 2+ years deep in a pretty big project full of highly async code. This shit would’ve been done a year ago if the stack was web based instead of 100% native code

            • v0rld@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Easy to make? Have you worked with JavaScript before? It’s an absolute mess and full of footguns.

              And I assume your project doesn’t use async code for shits and giggles? Async code is just as hard in JavaScript except that everything is single threaded anyway.

              And even assuming that it really is easier to make: I’d rather have fewer well made applications than hundreds of crappy ones. Each fucking application having to redistribute a whole ass browser is insane, and they’re all slow despite needing massive resources.

              • vivendi@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                Yeah this is on me, I’ve never done web dev in my life. Always been low level shit for me. (The project is a highly networked system with isolates, async/await, futures, etc)

                But damn man comparatively JS/TS seems a lot easier ¯\_ (ツ) _/¯

                • v0rld@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  That is true, Typescript and JavaScript look easier. And heck if all you want to do is make the money dance on your web page it really is easier.

                  But writing actual application? That does actual work with error handling? Hell, no. It honestly baffles me that anyone would use JavaScript of their own free will, unless that’s the only language you know.

          • A7thStone@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Agreed. So you wrote a shitty web page that breaks constantly, but you still wasn’t me to download it as an “app” so you can track me better? No thanks.

  • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The top bit got me recently, I hadn’t needed to remote into my desktop in a while and searched “Remote” and “RDP” and found nothing. Eventually I found it was renamed to the windows app and finally logged in but was baffled as to why they would do that.

  • graycube@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I was in a computer store a few years ago watching a young guy trying to sell a tablet to an older woman. He said “the good news about this is that it can’t get viruses because it runs apps”.

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If you assume that she will only install official apps, that they are sandboxed and Apple doesn’t allow viruses in App Store apps, then that statement seems fine to me.

      Every networked computer has some risk of getting a viris of course.

  • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Not sure if this fits this comm, but I hate that the act of buying a phone plan and inseting a sim card is now referred to as “activation”.

    “Activation” is the iPhone forced internet-setup thing, not the fact that you use wifi-only instead of cellular. 🤦‍♂️

    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You understand that SIM cards aren’t actually active until they’re connected to the network for the first time, right?

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Why are you buying a phone plan if you’re not using the mobile network?

          • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I know one person who does this. It’s simple: apple discontinued the ipod touch. He had no other choice than to get an iphone without a sim

          • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            No, I mean the context is, when you buy a phone from Best Buy, the sales person uses deceptive language to frame it as if your phone will not function unless you purchase a plan by asking “Would you like to activate your phone right now”, implying its locked and can’t even be used for Google Voice/VOIP calls, and as a multi-function tool (GPS, Camera, Notes, E-Reader, Audio Recorder, etc…).

            Deceptive Corporatist language.

            • kungen@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Aha, okay, much clearer what you meant now. Yeah, they surely get a kickback for each new subscription.

      • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Perhaps it isn’t exactly a new term, but I hate that term regardless. A smartphone can do many things without a cellular connection, a cell plan is not an “activation” but a feature upgrade.

        • deur@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          You’re not even right. You are genuinely activating the SIM card and anyone around you paraphrasing to “activating a phone” is also correct, because nobody cares what other meaning you personally wish to ascribe to the task.