• AugustWest@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s interesting. I have seen lightning split a tree and then follow wires into a house blowing out the wall all long the path of the wires. I have also seen it lift up decking when following underground wires.

    But if lightning hits with no lightning rod and ground is equally everywhere I guess I could imagine this result.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I read somewhere that the induced electical field shift near a lightning strike is - while orders of magnitude calmer than the strike itself - still powerful enough to burn, maim and kill.

      I think it’s what Wikipedia calls “side splash” in the article on lightning injury?

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      and ground is equally everywhere

      You make an interesting point; Lapland is known for being relatively flat, often stony and pretty much treeless. I’m sure that contributed to an increased radius.

      • virku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lapland is in Finland. Hardangervidda is in Norway. It is flat as well though.

          • virku@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            In Norway we don’t use the lappland term for that area. That is just the area the sapmi originates for us. I knew that lappland was an official region in Finland, but didn’t know until now that it was an official region in Sweden as well. In Norway however the outlined area roughly consists of Finnmark, Troms, Nordland and Trøndelag.

            I guess we didn’t learn Sweden and Finlands regions in elementary school here in Norway in the 90s. I didn’t at least.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Its just a different name for the same region.

              Lapland (Sápmi in Northern Sami, Sää’mjânnam in Koltan Sami, Säämi in Inari Sami, Norwegian and Swedish Lappland, Russian Лапландия, Laplandija) is a historical region in the northern part of Fennoscandia in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Russia. [1] The Sámi are the indigenous people of the region.

              Lapland does not form a unified administrative region

              It’s just that collectively there’s a change trying to stop using any terms with “lapp” in the due to its connotations, but since our language is very different, the connotation didn’t ever transfer and people have no idea it’s offensive in origin. So se do talk about the Sami people, when talking about the indigenous people, but anyone living in that area would be reasonably called “a lapplander”.

              Or idk, at least some people I’ve seen online have said it’s been used as an ethnic slur against the indigenous peoples at times, but I can’t find anything of that in Finnish. Which would explain why you call it Sapmi, because that’s the indigenous name for the people and the area and there may have been historical connotations with “lapp”, which we don’t have.

              I thought you we’re Finnish from the username sounding a tad Finnish and being on sopuli. And I thought Finns ought to know that despite it being also an administrative region in Finland, it also refers to the whole area.

              My mistake.

        • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          Oh, sorry I just assumed Lapland when I saw reindeer.

          Lapland - or Sápmi to be precise, but that’s an even larger area - is in the North of Finland, Sweden and Norway.