Well many people consider MacOS easy to use but it still has a learning curve if you’re coming from Windows. Same goes to GNOME. It’s not a Windows or MacOS clone so it does need some figuring out.
I use Arch based distros btw.
Well many people consider MacOS easy to use but it still has a learning curve if you’re coming from Windows. Same goes to GNOME. It’s not a Windows or MacOS clone so it does need some figuring out.
In case you didn’t know, nowadays GNOME goes for maximum simplicity.
Because the previous one was old and not very well suited for the modern GNOME design. Also the new one has a neat visualizer!
Finally.
Yea that’s a big problem.
Nah that’s a bad idea. Keep the security requirements strict.
Afaik the HDR support is experimental and not universal yet. I think it would be nice to have it finished for those rich folks.
HDR support and better maintainers are the things I can remember now.
and v3 is probably acceptable by now.
No.
I think it’s because more cutting-edge options are not anywhere near as easy to set up and use.
Also visit flatpak.org for more information about how stable distros get around the old packages issue.
Ok Wayland shill.
Ok so it’s basically a yet another point of fragmentation. Nice.
How is it different to runit or openrc?
I would think twice before using a service that implements any geoblocking.
Here we’re talking about PCs that can’t officially run Windows 11.
Contradictory? Hmm I really think otherwise. But I’m a real GNOME shill so I guess I’m not the kind of person to discuss it properly.