“What did you do this weekend?”
“I went to the second, secret Burning Man where they immolate an actual man.”
“What did you do this weekend?”
“I went to the second, secret Burning Man where they immolate an actual man.”
No ads or subscriptions, no endless DLC.
Unfortunately, if you’re looking for a free download, the game you’re describing doesn’t exist.
The closest I can think of is Postknight 2. There’s unobtrusive (optional) ads, and the full game is playable—start to finish—without spending any money.
It’s very cute, and you can get pets… but it’ll take some dedicated playtime to unlock them for free.
I am sorry. You need help that we cannot give on a message board. You need to find a trusted person you can tell your story to. You should ask them for help.
Good luck.
You seem to be very intentionally dodging the question everybody in this discussion has been asking: Why are you, an adult, being taken care of by a family member?
Aside from very literally answering the question by saying, “Well my sister is taking care of me because Mom is gone,” you haven’t addressed the subtext of that question: why do you need taking care of at all? Do you have some form of condition that requires you to have a caregiver as an adult?
Please make careful note of sentences I have written that end in question marks (“?”)—those answers are important.
I caught my kids to throw light switch raves, but they don’t know the context. It’s spread to their friends, also context-less.
But really, I don’t think anything can top that one email where Compy gets Old Yellered.
If you want to give a gift that’s simultaneously very thoughtful AND a very shitty gift: buy him a pair of knee pads. Refuse to elaborate on why you bought them.
Oh wow dang he said the loud part out loud.
I wear tankies when it is hot out.
Web 3.0 is, more or less, what timeshares were to our predecessors. Here’s a thing you can theoretically use, but in practice, it’s useless and just cons you out of a ton of cash. And the theoretical thing will never actually exist.
Short answer: No.
Long answer: Your laptop desires are common, but unprofitable. Even if manufacturers charged twice as much for them, they’d lose out in the long run. Because you wouldn’t need to buy a new one every three years.
It’s the same problem that mobile phones have. Year after year, the number one complaint in consumer surveys is: “I want longer battery life!” It’s been like that for 20 years now. You’re never gonna see it. The battery having a short daily life—as well as a short lifecycle (before you have to bin the device because the battery isn’t replaceable)—is an intentional design choice. It ensures you keep buying The Coolest New Thing every few years. That’s money in the bank, baby!
Nate is just coping about being so devastatingly wrong about his “96% chance of victory!” prediction.
Besides, it shouldn’t have been that close to begin with. The 2016 election should have been a wham bam slam jam thank you ma’am landslide win for the Democrats, on the scale of Reagan v. Mondale. The fact that it wasn’t should concern you about the party’s competence and/or goals.
I really wish they’d pick a better name. Ableism aside, it’s just a terrible name.
Ages ago, I won a bet that I would get carded at the pub if I shaved, even if I was wearing an expensive suit. I was 35 at the time.
The students are also protesting their schools’ complicity in the genocide. Many of the schools represented here serve as funnels to the military contractors who build the weapons the genocide relies on. And the schools are paid handsomely (via “grants”) by those big weapons companies. It’s sick from every angle.
Paul R. Allen
Well, kudos to your infinite patience for stupid dicks JusT asKINg QUesTioNs. Mine ran out ages ago. So now I’m just mean about it.
The answer to the question is, “None,” because it’s a stupid question.
It’s like if somebody said they hate cars, and we can do without them. Then some stupid asshole said, “I see. Should we return to the horse and buggy? Perhaps the rickshaw? Chariots, perhaps? Maybe a world where kings are carried on a throne upon the shoulders of slaves? Or maybe just piggyback rides? Kindly ignore the existence of trains and bicycles. Thanks!”
I reject the premise of the question, because the question isn’t asked in good faith, and is fucking stupid.
Wow. I didn’t know that. I just, uh, you’re telling me now for the first time. I’m actually sad to hear that. I am sad to hear that. Thank you very much.
You’d think every libertarian weirdo out there would be 101% on board with Hamas. Their existence is the end product of what happens when the government takes all peaceful options off the table: you must be prepared to do violence, because there is no other choice but death.