It will only help the earliest of beginners. If java 1.1 included this i would understand, but at this point I don’t see it
It will only help the earliest of beginners. If java 1.1 included this i would understand, but at this point I don’t see it
They all require the template processor to be specified, but I’m likely to convert hundreds or thousands of lines of existing string concatenation to templates in one of my projects and I really appreciate that the only \{ that show up will be the ones I create.
I’ve never heard one. Can you point me to an example?
Why single bevel?
I think complete extinction is pretty unlikely, I expect that small enclaves will continue to exist. And if there are still humans in 100 years there will still be humans in 10,000 years.
I can’t say that I agree with your vision of an ideal society, but it sounds pretty good if you want to keep capitalism and capitalists
Your comment shows as3minutes old and the original post as 9. So that’s consistent. @HollowNotion@lemmy.world, did we pass?
Your analysis looks right to me. If this were mine I’d initialize all three before submitting any.
Java 11 allows you to paste in JavaScript and it largely just works
Var is not Javascript. It’s not even type inference. It just reduces redundancy in the boilerplate.
The module changes are a PITA, but not increasingly difficult. There aren’t really other big backwards incompatible changes
The actual backend improvements keep being pushed
What changes are you referring to?
Can’t watch the video right now but it makes a ton of sense that java would be having a resurgence. Pre-java 8 it felt like the every day I ran into problems it would be easier to solve in other languages. I’m still mostly on 8 and it feels pretty modern still. I’m super excited to move to 17 and 21 for all the new features, though.
That’s the question, though, isn’t it?
nazis would obviously be against them, but how else are they bad?
This is the first I’ve heard of them, but if they end up serving more as nazi networking than nazi deradicalization I would be against them.
This is much less readable if non-trivial. It’s easy enough here, but now I need to search through the code to see where else foo was set.
Without it we might accidentally Lol or lOL. It would be anarchy
I don’t know how you would get more specific.
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. I just shared it with my kids. But we’re godly seeing across the spiderverse tonight, so that might change.
This country is insane. How does this protect anyone?
IMHO it should be used for parameters, as long as there is more than one optional parameter. If rather all non nullable parameters though, which is usually doable.
Optional! I was reluctant at first because of the nullibility, but it’s so useful.
I’m not sure this is what you were going for. I think most people know about optional and are skeptical because it’s not a fix for nullability.
Any highlights? I haven’t watched any yet but I’ve learned a lot from Venkat Subramaniam’s prior presentations