Welp, that’s one way to teach that the scope is important when pen testing.
Welp, that’s one way to teach that the scope is important when pen testing.
I’m not sure how much of an outlier I am, but for me it usually goes
How much I use each one really depends on the day
Then let’s assume the people in charge want Trump back in office. Wouldn’t it just make more sense to make political contributions to him and others sympathetic to his platform? That carries less reputational risk than investing in a known to fail platform.
Plus it’s worth mentioning that those are assets under management ; they have to answer to their investors for every time they allocate. They can’t just freely swing that around like most people think
Bud, I know it’s pretty easy to jump down into conspiratorial rabbit holes whenever talking about Blackrock, vanguard, etc but let me ask you this:
Which sounds like a more solid plan? Investing in a platform that was dead in the water from the start, with no financial future. Or just donating to a bunch of politicians that are okay with your business practices?
I’m not saying they aren’t causing a good bit of harm but you don’t become the largest investment management firm on the planet by being that stupid
Blackrock may have deep pockets but they’re not that idiotic.
I just graduated with my degree in CSEC and, while my college luckily never had us do that, I know at least 10 people who would have found a way to trick it somehow into reporting false data
I probably should have just said lightning instead
I try to make rocks think with electricity and then cry when it doesn’t think the way I want it to (software engineer)
Early game is a bit confusing and direction less last I played but once you get your bearings its a load of fun