☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
- 1.82K Posts
- 1.29K Comments
I think this is pretty comprehensive. Das Kapital is a good read as well, but it’s more theoretical in terms of analyzing capitalist mechanics. It’s a bit of tough read as well in my opinion. I think the books on the list are more practical in terms of explaining how tangible action works.
Another book I found really interesting was The East is Still Red. It describes China’s path from the revolution, and it has a lot of insights into how society and economy evolves after the revolution https://redletterspp.com/products/the-east-is-still-red
That’s a solid list, and well organized too! Lenin and Mao complement each other really well I find.
Using Linux as the default is definitely very cool!
I’ve got a friend who joined PSL, and it sounds like they are a principled party. I’m less familiar with FRSO, but my understanding is that they have a Maoist lean.
Join an org like PSL.
This is akin to somebody living in 1930s Germany asking whether they should continue supporting the nazi party since they’re the only game in town.
The most superficial understanding of fascism. The original definition by Benito Mussolini was that fascism is corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power. Both parties very clearly represent the corporate class first and foremost.
https://chipublib.bibliocommons.com/list/share/204842963/1292628717
libs hate looking in the mirror
Kamala expressed her unwavering commitment to militarism and forever wars at the debate. Stop acting like we don’t know why she’s getting the neocon endorsements.
The fact that she’s at the highest levels of Biden admin is itself an endorsement of the policies of the administration she’s part of. She absolutely can be judged on that basis. On top of that, everything she has said publicly clearly indicates that she’s all in on the genocide. She even repeated debunked October 7th rape claims at the debate. There is no question of where she stands. It’s the height of intellectual dishonesty to continue pretending otherwise.
61·3 days agoseems like that’s a scenario that’s most likely to happen in burgerland actually
That’s a pretty absurd rationalization. The whole point of claiming to care about facts is that you hold yourself to a higher standard instead of just going on feels. Meanwhile, the article makes it clear that it’s not just one oopsie, but a systemic pattern of lying on the part of Harris campaign.
That works against small isolated countries, but now there’s BRICS backed by Russia and China.
Thing is that everybody knows Trump is full of shit, and frankly none of his supporters care. Meanwhile, democrats are the ones who pretend to care about facts. Yet, here we see clear as day that they’re just as morally bankrupt as Trump in practice, and so is anybody who continues to carry water for them.
