Hypothetically, if a colleague has repeatedly demonstrated the utter lack of reading comprehension skills (like pulling the same door labelled “push” for the hundredth time), what job could one suggest for them where this “disability” wouldn’t be detrimental?

    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Since being able to read makes you unable to voluntarily suppress reading (at least in my experience), surely there is some way to prove that.

      Edit: Considei the well-known task where you see names of colors and you have to quickly say the color of the font itself (which is different from the color written).

    • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I bet that’s not too difficult with a Stroop test. A reading brain struggles to ignore names of colours when asked to describe the colour of squares, and the timing difference between coloured squares with correct words and incorrect words should beat anyone who hasn’t put in a lot of effort to train for this.

      Alternatively, though it’s probably not legal, you could probably use repeated imprinting of the McCollough effect combined with colour based contrast to make it essentially impossible for any human to read those documents. Staring at a set of McCollough images for 15 minutes can actually alter your visual perception for up to three whole months. I’m sure there’s a way this can be weaponised for secure disposal in some ways, although it’s quite an ask for the employees subject to it.

    • bmsok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fair point. But, medically and developmentally speaking there are people with a lower mental capacity that literally can’t read. The entire adult care industry exists for a reason. Those people need something to do so they don’t simply waste away.