That a random worker at Google would not only see this, but also make changes based on it. That kind of stuff only happens with indie devs and open source projects. Plenty of companies take things like this into consideration but workers aren’t going solo.
Would be irresponsible not to be tracking keywords ‘round the web… imagine if this discussion were “new Google Search CSAM exploit”! But I do expect some level of engagement really helps the odds of discussions being raised to a company’s attention, so you’re right it’s not a guarantee.
What’s funny?
That a random worker at Google would not only see this, but also make changes based on it. That kind of stuff only happens with indie devs and open source projects. Plenty of companies take things like this into consideration but workers aren’t going solo.
Google used to give their devs incredible leeway. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/the-wadsworth-constant
I’m all ears if you have a better idea
Try the feedback buttons under the hotline & the snippet, respectively.
The big adtech company is very active and sometimes quite responsive on the egotistical billionaire’s dying communications platform.
Twitter.com/SearchLiaison
BTW, complaints on the same site helped trigger a response RE: their language model yesterday.
>not rage bait
>likely that someone that works at Google could see this
> and fix the issue.
Your statements are funny.
It’s literally on “mildly infuriating”
It’s not likely that a Google programmer who works on search results would see it
And further then make changes to whatever response database and further have access and the go-ahead to do so
Aren’t they likely to see brand mentions?
Same principle:
Would be irresponsible not to be tracking keywords ‘round the web… imagine if this discussion were “new Google Search CSAM exploit”! But I do expect some level of engagement really helps the odds of discussions being raised to a company’s attention, so you’re right it’s not a guarantee.
Can you please point me to where I should cross post it then?
“you have to have a better idea then mine in order to show that me saying something is not ragebait and is LIKELY is wrong”
No