• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Slop isn’t free. Not only does it look bad and drive away visitors, they almost certainly used an AI trained on unlicensed (i.e. stolen) artwork. There is no free lunch here.

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            18 days ago

            I know it’s a popular meme to say, “if buying isn’t owning, then piracy isn’t stealing”, but that is brainrot. It’s not even consistent with fair labor practices. It would be like a company saying “if your work doesn’t produce value for me, then the time and effort you put in should not be compensated”. That’s not the deal.

            Artists should be paid, and pirating art is stealing. It’s just that, in the name of equity and the love of art, they might be OK with it if someone who can’t afford it doesn’t pay. But speaking on behalf of every artist ever: when a corporation who absolutely can afford it doesn’t pay, it’s stealing, and the artists want their damn compensation.

              • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                15 days ago

                I agree with you that it’s not theft. Theft legally well defined and distinct from copyright infringement. I’m saying copyright infringement is stealing. You are taking from an artist their living. It’s honestly baffling to me that one could mental gymnastics themselves into believing otherwise.

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  15 days ago

                  The images still exist in their original locations, they have not been stolen.