• ChrisHani@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was beneficial.

    To white property owners. Much to the detriment of enslaved Africans and their descendants.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally the first sentence of the article. Emphasis added.

      Students at Florida public schools will now learn that Black people benefitted from slavery because it taught them skills.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ironically, one of the (many) reasons this is total bullshit is that not all slaves were imported for unskilled physical labor. In the Carolinas, when landowners began growing rice they paid a premium for female slaves from west Africa who had experience with rice cultivation because they had no idea how to do it themselves. So it would be accurate to say that white people benefited from slavery because it taught them skills.

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Property? That’s a bit broad…

      It was beneficial to slave owners, specifically.

      And their families should be paying reparations for the ill gotten gains.

      • TerryMathews@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re sniping, but I think the parent poster was accurate in what they said. I don’t think it was an euphemism for slave. It was the 1800s. What would you do with a slave if you didn’t own property? If they’re not tilling and planting or harvesting, or keeping house, or cooking, what would they be doing? A horse would be far more effective at pulling a carriage, and keeping one as a sex slave - while it definitely happened - was strongly looked down upon by society at the time.

        If you kept a slave and had no good reason to own one aside from sex, you might well disappear in the night one night - not out of protection for the slave(s) but racial purity.

        • sadreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most property owners ie had a plot of land could not afford a slave… they worked that land themselves and then forced their 6 kids do it for them.

        • pingveno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve become partial to a language change to enslaved people and slavers. It emphasizes the humanity of the victims of slavery and refuses to acknowledge the view of human beings as property. Instead enslavement is a property foisted upon the victims and enslavement is an evil perpetrated by slavers.

        • sadreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cell phone and a car are also property… So is a house…

          Not all property owners were slavers.

        • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Slavery benefitted both white and non-white slave owners.

          Edit: at least in the short-term, obviously you could argue differently for long-term effects.

        • SirElliott@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is an incomplete view of the history of slavery. By the numbers, the vast majority of the people benefitting from chattel slavery were white. However, slave ownership reached similar per capita rates among some of the Native American tribes, and there were instances of slaves being owned by free people of color. Notably, there are a large number of black tribal members in the United States. The United States government signed a number of treaties with the tribes in the 1860s that required them to free their slaves and incorporate them as full tribal members.

          None of this is said to diminish the fact that the American system of slavery was a product of colonization by European countries. But it is rather reductive to claim that only white property owners benefitted from the atrocity that was chattel slavery.

        • sadreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          While vast majority were “white”… There were others who owned slaves.

          All of their families should be held accountable and their profits and wealth should be dislodged to pay reperations to the decedants.

          Allowing successors to keep these gains is a crime in of itself.

          • trias10@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            How could you even track accounting profits that far back in time to repay today? What if the family descendants are poor today? (They lost everything in the Great Depression, as an example)

            • sadreality@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Funny thing about money is that it is all traceable. I am not going to act like it is easy but it is not impossible

              Sure if money is gone, you can’t get blood from a stone… But many families who made money are still ruling us.

              Same thing in Germany with families who profited from slave labor during Nazi regimes…

  • xuxebiko@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    pass on the message that “slavery was so beneficial that this time white people should be enslaved” and watch the whole thing die out.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes! Let’s take turnsies! I nominate the entire upper class! It’s time for people like Musk and his ilk to get into the mines!

      • xuxebiko@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        my turn : I nominate all right-wing politicians.

        why should they be denied the many benefits of slavery?

        • Bipta@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Repealing slavery is the third rail of American politics!

          /s, but for a while literally yes.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re already on the way to doing that. The slow striping of worker’s rights won’t have a natural end until everyone but the elites are serfs.

      • flipht@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t stop working. Even if my retirement accounts continue to exist for the three more decades it will take me to begin drawing from them, I have no way to know and absolutely no trust that they quantity of money will be sufficient to support me.

        The bank can take pretty much anything I own if I lose my job and fall behind, which severely curtails my ability to do anything except exactly what I’m told at work.

        What’s the major difference between this and serfdom, except that my current lords don’t even have to supply me with food and shelter directly?

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Some are actually trying to bring company towns back. In some countries, Walmart pays their employees, in whole or in part, with gift cards.

          • flipht@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            In the US, Walmart pays their employees by teaching them to file for food stamps and then keeping their pay depressed enough to qualify.

  • borlax@lemmy.borlax.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a sick thing to say…

    When you care more about profits than people, that’s the kind of slavery apologist shit that you say… just disgusting…

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Students at Florida public schools will now learn that Black people benefitted from slavery because it taught them skills.”

      Are these people fucking insane?

      • borlax@lemmy.borlax.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t wanna chalk it up to some psychological issue, but I think they are very much in denial about this and will say anything to absolve themselves of the responsibility they have to teach history before it repeats.

        So instead, they rewrite history…

        Which brings me to my next point. I also don’t want to chalk it up to some psychological issue because literally whitewashing history like this is an evil thing to do. It’s a choice they are making…

        • Nukemin Herttua@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For some it’s intentional and motivated by racism. For others it’s probably just cold and calculated opportunism.

          The latter don’t really care as long as they profit politically or financially from such policies. It’s like selling your soul to a devil, because “who cares”.

          Anyone supporting bullshit like that should experience few years as a slave to really see what the benefits are. Stupid assholes…

  • QubaXR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Increasing temperatures and CO2 levels have been linked to decreased brain function. People literally can’t think straight and get dumber. With the weather in Florida, Texas, this is beginning to check out.

    On all seriousness though, how is this even legal for a bunch of local statesmen to resign educational system, whitewash history, prosecute women and minorities? At what point does the federal government step in?

      • QubaXR@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, sure, but just what’s the point of having The United States of each state sets up laws so different from other ones that they could practically was about them.

    • salarua@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      as usual, the federal government will step in when each and every member of Congress is personally affected. because, y’know, any societal ill you don’t personally experience is just oversensitive snowflakes whining /s

  • TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    The changes to Florida’s education system made in the previous decade have been dismal. Florida is driving itself into the ground, not the least because climate change will sink the state in the next century. DeSantis and his ilk need to be removed from office and soon or the states they govern could take decades or even possibly a century to recover.

      • SeatBeeSate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fascism. Don’t let neo conservative ethno fascists hide behind some cushy word. They know what they are, we know what they are.

        • salarua@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          this. the GOP has picked their lane, and anyone who doesn’t completely and unequivocally oppose the GOP is a fascist. this isn’t a generalization or hyperbole, it’s political reality now

        • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same thing. Except I think Conservatism embraces ignorance more. Fascism + Prideful Ignorance = Conservatism

  • sorebuttfromsitting@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    the linked article is quite poorly written, but I also had to look at 4 different stories to find some details

    When high school students learn about events such as the 1920 Ocoee massacre, the new rules require that instruction include “acts of violence perpetrated against and by African Americans.” The massacre is considered the deadliest Election Day violence in US history and, according to several histories of the incident, it started when Moses Norman, a prominent Black landowner in the Ocoee, Florida, community, attempted to cast his ballot and was turned away by White poll workers.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/atlanta/news/florida-board-of-education-approves-new-black-history-standards-that-critics-call-a-big-step-backward/

  • bioemerl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every time someone says America was built on slavery they are saying slavery was beneficial.

    Our nation would be larger and stronger if slavery never existed. Never forget that slavery stole from all of us.

    • TerryMathews@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do. DeSantis’s anti-woke legislation forced textbook makers to transform Rosa Parks into bus Karen. Seriously, Google it, don’t take my word for it.

    • Umbra@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I checked the source document and it looks like an extremely comprehensive and fair overview of slavery.
      Check it out for yourselves, the African American part is right at the beginning: https://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/20653/urlt/6-4.pdf
      The offending part is on page 6

      Examine the various duties and trades performed by slaves (e.g., agricultural
      work, painting, carpentry, tailoring, domestic service, blacksmithing,
      transportation).
      Clarification 1: Instruction includes how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be
      applied for their personal benefit.

      Maybe looks bad on its own but looking at the whole document you can see how the framing in OP is ridiculous.

      • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, from this excerpt, in no way is it saying that slavery was good because they learned skills that later beneficial to them.

      • verbalbotanics@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So I read the document, and I think it’s actually worse than what OP wrote. Looking through the curriculum, there’s a steady emphasis on African Americans as “patriots”

        Identify African Americans who demonstrated heroism and patriotism (e.g.,Booker T. Washington, Jesse Owens, Tuskegee Airmen, Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, President…

        And conveniently there’s no mention of how systemic racism and white supremacy still exist and oppress African Americans today. Garvey, etc. Are mentioned but conveniently in the past.

        Which is what they want. Emphasize the model people and show that they can be patriots. Downplay what you don’t like. Maybe your definition of education is different but I don’t think it should be about saying we should all be good little flag salutors.

        I agree that it’s rage bait, but you can’t trust Florida on this.

        Btw the fact that America makes kids pledge an oath to a flag every morning is fucked up, just saying.

        • Umbra@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          “And conveniently there’s no mention of how systemic racism and white supremacy still exist and oppress African Americans today.”

          Because they shouldn’t teach fantasy in schools.